<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>designprinciplesandpractices.com &#187; 2009 &#187; December &#187; 23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/2009/12/23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designprinciplesandpractices.com</link>
	<description>An international Conference, a scholarly Journal, a book Series, and an online knowledge Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Technology first, invention second, needs last</title>
		<link>http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/2009/12/23/technology-first-invention-second-needs-last/</link>
		<comments>http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/2009/12/23/technology-first-invention-second-needs-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designprinciplesandpractices.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald A.Norman recently posted an essay to his web site http://www.jnd.org discussing technological innovation.
I&#8217;ve come to a disconcerting conclusion: design research is great when it comes to improving existing product categories but essentially useless when it comes to new, innovative breakthroughs. I reached this conclusion through examination of a range of product innovations, most especially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1620" title="dan-thumb" src="http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/files/2009/12/dan-thumb.jpg" alt="dan-thumb" width="200" height="267" />Donald A.Norman recently posted an essay to his web site http://www.jnd.org discussing technological innovation.</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve come to a disconcerting conclusion: design research is great when it comes to improving existing product categories but essentially useless when it comes to new, innovative breakthroughs. I reached this conclusion through examination of a range of product innovations, most especially looking at those major conceptual breakthroughs that have had huge impact upon society as well as the more common, mundane small, continual improvements. Call one conceptual breakthrough, the other incremental. Although we would prefer to believe that conceptual breakthroughs occur because of a detailed consideration of human needs, especially fundamental but unspoken hidden needs so beloved by the design research community, the fact is that it simply doesn&#8217;t happen.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/technology_first_needs_last.html" target="_blank">For the complete essay&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/2009/12/23/technology-first-invention-second-needs-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
